Acosta

Acosta v. California Highway Patrol

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20195:18-cv-00958California1,915 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 CRISTOBAL ACOSTA, Case No. 18-cv-00958-BLF

8 Plaintiff, ORDER SUA SPONTE

RECONSIDERING ORDER DENYING

9 v. THE PARTIES’ REQUEST TO

CONTINUE TRIAL (ECF 74),

10 CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, et GRANTING THE PARTIES’ REQUEST al., TO CONTINUE TRIAL (ECF 64); SUA 11 SPONTE RECONSIDERING ORDER Defendants. DENYING MOTION TO REMAND TO 12 STATE COURT (ECF 80), GRANTING

MOTION TO REMAND TO STATE

13 COURT (ECF 66)

14 15 Upon review of Plaintiff’s Reply in Support of Motion to Remand Entire Action to State 16 Court (Reply, ECF 79) and as discussed during the September 17, 2019 case management 17 conference, the Court has sua sponte RECONSIDERED its Order Denying The Parties’ Request to 18 Continue Trial (ECF 74) and now GRANTS the parties’ request to Continue Trial and Related…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.