Acosta
Acosta v. California Highway Patrol
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20195:18-cv-00958California1,915 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 CRISTOBAL ACOSTA, Case No. 18-cv-00958-BLF
Plaintiff, ORDER SUA SPONTE
RECONSIDERING ORDER DENYING
v. THE PARTIES’ REQUEST TO
CONTINUE TRIAL (ECF 74),
CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, et GRANTING THE PARTIES’ REQUEST al., TO CONTINUE TRIAL (ECF 64); SUA SPONTE RECONSIDERING ORDER Defendants. DENYING MOTION TO REMAND TO STATE COURT (ECF 80), GRANTING
MOTION TO REMAND TO STATE
COURT (ECF 66)
14 Upon review of Plaintiff’s Reply in Support of Motion to Remand Entire Action to State Court (Reply, ECF 79) and as discussed during the September 17, 2019 case management conference, the Court has sua sponte RECONSIDERED its Order Denying The Parties’ Request to Continue Trial (ECF 74) and now GRANTS the parties’ request to Continue Trial and Related…