Cromwell

Cromwell v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20193:18-cv-06187California6,292 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ASHLEY CROMWELL, Case No. 18-cv-06187-EMC

8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

9 v. JUDGMENT, AND DENYING

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

10 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN, JUDGMENT 11 Defendant. Docket Nos. 42, 49

12 13 14 In this suit, Ashley Cromwell alleges that Kaiser Foundation Health Plan (“Kaiser”) 15 violated ERISA. The action relates to health benefits for Ms. Cromwell’s daughter who has 16 autism. Currently pending before the Court are two motions: (1) Kaiser’s motion for summary 17 judgment pursuant to Rule 56 and (2) Ms. Cromwell’s motion for judgment pursuant to Federal 18 Rule of Civil Procedure 52.1 19 Having considered the parties’ briefs and accompanying submissions, as well as the oral 20 argument of counsel, the Court hereby GRANTS Kaiser’s motion. Because the Court is granting 21 Kaiser’s motion, Ms. Cromwell’s motion is DENIED. 22 23 24 1 In conjunction with the motions, Kaiser has filed a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.