Cromwell
Cromwell v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ASHLEY CROMWELL, Case No. 18-cv-06187-EMC
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
v. JUDGMENT, AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN, JUDGMENT Defendant. Docket Nos. 42,
12 13 In this suit, Ashley Cromwell alleges that Kaiser Foundation Health Plan (“Kaiser”) violated ERISA. The action relates to health benefits for Ms. Cromwell’s daughter who has autism. Currently pending before the Court are two motions: (1) Kaiser’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 and (2) Ms. Cromwell’s motion for judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52.1 Having considered the parties’ briefs and accompanying submissions, as well as the oral argument of counsel, the Court hereby GRANTS Kaiser’s motion. Because the Court is granting Kaiser’s motion, Ms. Cromwell’s motion is DENIED. 22 23 24 1 In conjunction with the motions, Kaiser has filed a…