Baird

Baird v. BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20194:17-cv-01892California1,678 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CHARLES BAIRD, et al., Case No. 17-cv-01892-HSG (KAW)

8 Plaintiffs,

ORDER REGARDING JOINT

9 v. DISCOVERY LETTER

10 BLACKROCK INSTITUTIONAL TRUST Re: Dkt. No. 262 COMPANY, N.A., et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 On March 6, 2019, the parties filed a joint discovery letter regarding Defendants’ 14 discovery log, in which Plaintiffs sought the production of thirty-three documents. (Discovery 15 Letter, Dkt. No. 262.) On May 1, 2019, the Court ordered the parties to file supplemental briefing 16 as to whether revisions to guidelines are subject to the fiduciary exception. (Dkt. No. 282 at 1.) 17 The Court also ordered Defendants to produce certain documents for in camera review. (Id., Dkt. 18 No. 299.) Defendants filed their supplemental brief on May 8, 2019, and Plaintiffs filed their 19 supplemental brief on May 15, 2019. (Defs.’ Supp. Brief, Dkt. No. 284; Plfs.’ Supp. Brief, Dkt. 20 No. 293.) Having reviewed the parties’ briefing, the relevant legal authority, and the in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.