Kannan

Kannan v. Apple Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20195:17-cv-07305California2,460 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVSION 7 8 RAJA KANNAN, Case No.17-cv-07305-EJD (VKD)

9 Plaintiff,

ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTES

v. 10 Re: Dkt. Nos. 108, 110, 112, 113, 114, 115 11 APPLE INC., Defendant. 12

13 14 The parties in this case have asked the Court to resolve a number of discovery disputes. 15 Dkt Nos. 108, 110, 112, 113, 114, 115. The Court held a hearing on all disputes on September 24, 16 2019. Dkt. No. 117. For the reasons stated on the record, and as further described below, the 17 Court resolves the disputes as follows: 18 I. MR. KANNAN’S MOTIONS 19 A. Dkt. No. 108 (Ex. 1) and Dkt. No. 114 20 Plaintiff Raja Kannan moves to compel Apple’s compliance with the Court’s prior 21 discovery order issued on July 11, 2019 (Dkt. No. 105). Mr. Kannan seeks sanctions for Apple’s 22 alleged non-compliance. Apple contends that it has complied with the Court’s prior order. 23 This dispute arises principally from a disagreement between the parties regarding the scope 24 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.