Barajas

Barajas v. Carriage Cemetery Services of California, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20193:19-cv-02035California2,329 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 YOSHIRA BARAJAS, Case No. 19-cv-02035-EMC

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

9 v. MOTION TO DISMISS

10 CARRIAGE CEMETERY SERVICES OF Docket No. 42 CALIFORNIA, INC., et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 14 Currently pending before the Court is Defendant Carriage Services, Inc.’s (“CSI”) motion 15 to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) or, in the alternative, for entry of 16 judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b). The Court has reviewed the parties’ briefs and accompanying 17 submissions and finds that this matter is suitable for disposition without oral argument. The 18 hearing on the motion is therefore VACATED. CSI’s motion is DENIED in its entirety. The 19 Court also orders Plaintiffs to file their second amended complaint within two days of the date of 20 this order. 21 I. DISCUSSION 22 The events giving rise to CSI’s motion are as follows. 23 In May 2019, CSI, along with other named defendants, moved to dismiss…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.