Limson

Limson v. Bridge Property Management Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20193:19-cv-02795California10,614 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARYROSE LIMSON, et al., Case No. 19-cv-02795-JCS Plaintiffs, 8 v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

BRIDGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING

COMPANY, DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 10,

12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs bring a putative class action against Defendant Bridge Property Management Company (“BPMC”), asserting claims under the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq., the California Investigative Consumer Reporting Agencies Act (“ICRAA”), Cal. Civ. Code § 1786, and California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200 et seq. Plaintiffs’ claims are based on BPMC’s alleged failure to follow certain disclosure requirements with respect obtaining consumer background reports about Plaintiffs, who applied to be tenants and residents of a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.