Limson
Limson v. Bridge Property Management Company
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARYROSE LIMSON, et al., 7 Case No. 19-cv-02795-JCS Plaintiffs, 8 v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 9 DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S
BRIDGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING
10 COMPANY, DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE 11 Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 10, 11
12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 Plaintiffs bring a putative class action against Defendant Bridge Property Management 15 Company (“BPMC”), asserting claims under the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), 15 16 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq., the California Investigative Consumer Reporting Agencies Act (“ICRAA”), 17 Cal. Civ. Code § 1786, and California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), Cal. Bus. & Prof. 18 Code § 17200 et seq. Plaintiffs’ claims are based on BPMC’s alleged failure to follow certain 19 disclosure requirements with respect obtaining consumer background reports about Plaintiffs, who 20 applied to be tenants and residents of a…