Aaron

Aaron v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20193:18-cv-03672California7,511 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7

ANTHONY AARON,

8 Case No. 18-cv-03672-JCS Plaintiff, 9 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY 10 JUDGMENT, DENYING

ANDREW M. SAUL, COMMISSIONER’S MOTION FOR

11 SUMMARY JUDGMENT, REVERSING Defendant. DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER 12 AND REMANDING FOR FURTHER

PROCEEDINGS

13 Re: Dkt. Nos. 15, 20 14 I. INTRODUCTION 15 Plaintiff Anthony Aaron seeks review of the final decision of Defendant Andrew M. Saul, 16 Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”), denying his applications for disability 17 insurance benefits and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits under Titles II and XVI of 18 the Social Security Act. The parties have filed cross motions for summary judgment pursuant to 19 Civil Local Rule 16-5. For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion for 20 Summary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.