Lomeli

Lomeli v. Midland Funding, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20193:19-cv-01141California1,532 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11

12 JAIME PRIETO LOMELI, Case No. 19-CV-01141-LHK

13 Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SEAL

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

14 v. Re: Dkt. No. 65 15 MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 On June 25, 2019, Defendants Midland Funding, LLC and Midland Credit Management, 19 Inc. (collectively, the “Midland Defendants”) filed a Motion to Compel Arbitration. ECF No. 42 20 Defendants Hunt & Henriques (“H&H”), Michael Scott Hunt, and Janalie Ann Henriques 21 (collectively, the “H&H Defendants”) joined in that motion on July 22, 2019. ECF No. 52. On 22 the same day, the H&H Defendants also filed their own Motion to Compel Arbitration. ECF No. 23 51 (“H&H Def. Mot. to Compel”). In connection with their respective Motions to Compel 24 Arbitration, the Midland Defendants and the H&H Defendants filed redacted versions of several 25 documents as exhibits. On August 19, 2019, the Court ordered Defendants to file a motion to seal, 26 for parties are not permitted to unilaterally…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.