Deena L. Dias v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20191:18-cv-03233California8,365 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EUREKA DIVISION 7 8 DEENA L. DIAS, Case No. 18-cv-03233-RMI

9 Plaintiff,

ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR

10 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

11 NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Re: Dkt. Nos. 19, 20 12 Defendant.

13 14 Plaintiff, Deena Dias seeks judicial review of an administrative law judge (“ALJ”) decision 15 denying her application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. 16 Plaintiff’s request for review of the ALJ’s unfavorable decision was denied by the Appeals 17 Council, thus, the ALJ’s decision is the “final decision” of the Commissioner of Social Security 18 which this court may review. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), 1383(c)(3). Both parties have consented to 19 the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge (dkts. 7, 11), and both parties have moved for summary 20 judgment (dkts. 19, 20). For the reasons stated below, the court will grant Plaintiff’s motion for 21 summary judgment, and will deny Defendant’s motion for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.