Paschal
Paschal v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EUREKA DIVISION 7 8 KAJUAN PASCHAL, Case No. 18-cv-01932-RMI
9 Plaintiff,
ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR
10 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT
11 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL Re: Dkt. Nos. 18, 23
SECURITY,
12 Defendant. 13 14 Plaintiff, Kajuan Paschal, received supplemental security income (“SSI”) disability 15 payments under Title XVI of the Social Security Act as a child; and, upon reevaluation of his 16 eligibility when he turned 18, a finding was entered that he was no longer disabled as of July 1, 17 2014. Plaintiff now seeks judicial review of the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) decision that 18 denied him continuing SSI benefits. Plaintiff’s request for review of the ALJ’s unfavorable 19 decision was denied by the Appeals Council, thus, the ALJ’s decision is the “final decision” of the 20 Commissioner of Social Security which this court may review. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), 21 1383(c)(3). Both parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate…