Paschal

Paschal v. Commissioner of Social Security

Caution
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20191:18-cv-01932California7,917 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 KAJUAN PASCHAL, Case No. 18-cv-01932-RMI

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL Re: Dkt. Nos. 18,

SECURITY,

12 Defendant. 13 Plaintiff, Kajuan Paschal, received supplemental security income (“SSI”) disability payments under Title XVI of the Social Security Act as a child; and, upon reevaluation of his eligibility when he turned 18, a finding was entered that he was no longer disabled as of July 1, 2014. Plaintiff now seeks judicial review of the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) decision that denied him continuing SSI benefits. Plaintiff’s request for review of the ALJ’s unfavorable decision was denied by the Appeals Council, thus, the ALJ’s decision is the “final decision” of the Commissioner of Social Security which this court may review. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), 1383(c)(3). Both parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.