Miller v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20193:18-cv-07225California2,136 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ATHENA MILLER,

Case No. 18-cv-07225-JCS (PR) Petitioner, 12 v. ORDER OF DISMISSAL

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

14 Respondent. Dkt. No. 8

16 INTRODUCTION Petitioner, a federal prisoner convicted in Texas but housed in this district, seeks habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 from her federal convictions and sentence. As a general rule, federal prisoners must pursue such relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Petitioner seeks relief under § 2241 on grounds that § 2255 is an inadequate means to test the legality of her conviction. However, petitioner has not shown she is entitled to use § 2241, as pointed out in respondent’s motion to dismiss. (Dkt. No. 8.) Because she cannot use § 2241, this Court lacks jurisdiction over her petition. Accordingly, the petition is DISMISSED. 26 27 BACKGROUND In 2009 petitioner pleaded guilty in the United States District Court in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.