Ward

Ward v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London, Subscribing to Certificate No. B1132HGBA15062712

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20193:18-cv-07551California3,380 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

INTRODUCTION

25 In this insurance action, both an insured and the beneficiary of his insurance policy seek 26 to recover from both their insurance broker and the insurance company. This order resolves the 27 insurance company’s cross-complaint and the broker’s third-party complaint. Specifically, to 28 the extent stated below, the broker’s motion to dismiss the cross-complaint is DENIED and the 1 STATEMENT 2 This insurance story began in 2015 when plaintiffs Andre Ward and Roc Nation Sports, 3 LLC, sought a professional athlete disability insurance policy. At the time, Andre Ward boxed 4 professionally. Plaintiffs, through their wholesale insurance broker, International Specialty 5 Insurance, Inc., secured a policy with underwriters at Lloyd’s of London. The policy listed the 6 “Insured Person” as Andre Ward and the “Owner & Beneficiary” of the policy as Roc Nation 7 Sports. At bottom, the policy provided a lump sum payment of $6.3 million if Andre Ward 8 suffered a career-ending injury during the policy period (from December 23, 2015 to December 9 23, 2016) (Amd. Compl. ¶¶ 23–28) (Dkt. No. 46). 10 Lloyd’s of London works as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.