Blevins

Blevins v. Iwuagwu

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 20195:18-cv-03429California3,264 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

SHONDOLYN ROCHELLE BLEVINS,

11 Case No. 18-03429 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, 12 ORDER OF DISMISSAL v. 13 14 CHARLESTON C. IWUAGWU, et al., 15 Defendants. 16

17 18 Plaintiff, a federal prisoner, filed the instant pro se civil rights action against 19 officials at Federal Correctional Institute in Dublin (“FCI”), where she was formerly 20 incarcerated. After an initial screening, the Court dismissed the complaint with leave to 21 amend to correct several deficiencies. (Docket No. 12.) Plaintiff’s amended complaint 22 was again dismissed with leave to file a second amended complaint. (Docket No. 14.) 23 Plaintiff filed a second amended complaint. (Docket No. 18.) 24 25 DISCUSSION 26 A. Standard of Review 27 A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a 1 governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify any 2 cognizable claims and dismiss…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.