Tucker
Tucker v. Berryhill
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EUREKA DIVISION 7 8 EVALETTE TUCKER, Case No. 18-cv-01861-RMI
9 Plaintiff,
ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR
10 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT
11 NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Re: Dkt. Nos. 18, 24 12 Defendant.
13 14 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of an administrative law judge (“ALJ”) decision denying her 15 application for supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. 16 Plaintiff’s request for review of the ALJ’s unfavorable decision was denied by the Appeals 17 Council, thus, the ALJ’s decision is the “final decision” of the Commissioner of Social Security 18 which this court may review. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), 1383(c)(3). Both parties have consented to 19 the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge (dkts. 10 & 19), and both parties have moved for summary 20 judgment (dkts. 18 & 24). For the reasons stated below, the court will grant Plaintiff’s motion for 21 summary judgment, and will deny Defendant’s motion for summary…