Brown

Brown v. SF Sheriff's Dept.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20194:19-cv-04399California708 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 AARON BROWN, Case No. 19-cv-04399-HSG

8 Petitioner, ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS;

9 v. GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS; DENYING

10 DEPT. 15, et al., PENDING MOTIONS AS MOOT;

DENYING CERTIFICATE OF

11 Respondent. APPEALABILITY

12

13 Petitioner has filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 14 § 2254 challenging state court decisions in May and June 2019 that denied his Mardsen motion 15 and that found him incompetent to stand trial pursuant to California Penal Code § 1370. Dkt. No. 16 13. Petitioner alleges that the state court decisions violated his right to effective assistance of 17 counsel and his right to be free of double jeopardy, and that the state court made these unfavorable 18 rulings in retaliation for his accessing the courts. Dkt. No. 13 at 5. 19 STANDARD OF REVIEW 20 This Court may entertain a petition for writ…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.