Young

Young v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20194:18-cv-01721California5,131 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARY ANN YOUNG,

Case No. 18-cv-01721-DMR Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

NANCY A. BERRYHILL,

Re: Dkt. Nos. 18, 19 Defendant.

Plaintiff Mary Ann Young moves for summary judgment to reverse the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s (the “Commissioner’s”) final administrative decision, which found Young not disabled and therefore denied her application for benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. [Docket Nos. 18 (“Pltf. Mot.”), 20 (“Pltf. Reply”).] The Commissioner cross-moves to affirm. [Docket No. 19 (“Def. Mot.”).] For the reasons stated below, the court grants Young’s motion, denies the Commissioner’s cross-motion, and remands this case for further proceedings. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Young filed an application for Social Security Disability Insurance (“SSDI”) benefits on January 28,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.