Young
Young v. Berryhill
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6
MARY ANN YOUNG,
7 Case No. 18-cv-01721-DMR Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR 9 SUMMARY JUDGMENT
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
10 Re: Dkt. Nos. 18, 19 Defendant. 11
12 Plaintiff Mary Ann Young moves for summary judgment to reverse the Commissioner of 13 the Social Security Administration’s (the “Commissioner’s”) final administrative decision, which 14 found Young not disabled and therefore denied her application for benefits under Title II of the 15 Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. [Docket Nos. 18 (“Pltf. Mot.”), 20 (“Pltf. Reply”).] 16 The Commissioner cross-moves to affirm. [Docket No. 19 (“Def. Mot.”).] For the reasons stated 17 below, the court grants Young’s motion, denies the Commissioner’s cross-motion, and remands this 18 case for further proceedings. 19 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY 20 Young filed an application for Social Security Disability Insurance (“SSDI”) benefits on 21 January 28,…