B.
B. v. West Contra Costa Unified School District
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 BRENNON B., CASE NO. 19-cv-02394-YGR
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING
vs. IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
DISMISS
WEST CONTRA COSTA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL., Re: Dkt. No. 23 10 Defendants. 11 On September 24, 2019, the Court heard oral argument on defendant’s motion to dismiss, which was fully briefed. (Dkt. Nos. 23, 28, 29.) As stated on the record, and confirmed herein, having carefully considered the briefing and arguments submitted in this matter, defendant’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. First, with respect to defendants’ assertion that plaintiff’s claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”), 29 U.S.C. § 794 (“Section 504”), and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (“Title IX”) are untimely, the Court finds that the applicable statutes of limitations have been and continue to be tolled in light of plaintiff’s incompetence. See Tzolov v. International Jet …