Optronic Technologies, Inc. v. Ningbo Sunny Electronic Co., Ltd.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
OPTRONIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC,
Case No. 5:16-cv-06370-EJD Plaintiff, ORDER RE MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE v. EXPERT TESTIMONY 7 NINGBO SUNNY ELECTRONIC CO., Re: Dkt. Nos. 252, 254, 258, 260 LTD., et al., Defendants.
Both parties have filed motions to strike the testimony of two of the other party’s expert witnesses pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993). The court presently considers those motions. This order assumes familiarity with the facts and legal claims of this litigation, which are discussed in the court’s order on the parties’ summary judgment motions. Dkt. No. 313. The court has considered the parties’ briefing on the motions. For the reasons discussed below, the court denies Defendants’ motions to exclude the testimony of Dr. Sasian and Dr. Zona, grants in part and defers ruling on in…