WeWork Companies Inc. v. Weplus (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20195:18-cv-04543California3,697 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

WEWORK COMPANIES INC.,

Case No. 5:18-cv-04543-EJD Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S v. MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL WEPLUS (SHANGHAI) TECHNOLOGY PROCEDURE 12(b)(1) CO., LTD., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 49 Defendants.

Before the Court is Defendant We+ (Shanghai) Technology’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction (Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1)) and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted (Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)). Motion to Dismiss (“Mot.”), Dkt. 49. Defendant argues this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction because the case is moot. This Court agrees and GRANTS Defendant’s 12(b)(1) motion and does not reach the correlative 12(b)(6) motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, an American corporation, provides coworking services around the world under its “WE…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.