Tom

Johnson v. Tom

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20195:18-cv-01297California1,275 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7

SCOTT JOHNSON,

8 Case No. 5:18-cv-01297-EJD Plaintiff, 9 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ v. MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER FED. R. 10 CIV. P. 12(b)(1) FOR LACK OF LEONARD TOM, et al., SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION 11 Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 29 12

13 Defendants Leonard and Pearl Lai Tom move to dismiss the complaint for lack of subject- 14 matter jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1).1 Memorandum of Points 15 and Authorities in Support of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (“Mot.”), Dkt. 29. The Court finds 16 it appropriate to take the motion under submission for decision without oral argument pursuant to 17 Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is GRANTED. 18 I. BACKGROUND 19 Plaintiff Scott Johnson is a level C-5 quadriplegic. Complaint for Damages and Injunctive 20 Relief (“Compl.”) ¶ 1,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.