Jones

Jones v. Alameda District Attorney's Office

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 1, 20193:19-cv-04428California1,006 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

BRANDON LAWALTER JONES,

11 Case No. 19-cv-04428-RS (PR) Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER OF DISMISSAL 13

ALAMEDA DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S

14 OFFICE, et al., 15 Defendants.

16 17 Plaintiff is barred from bringing this federal civil rights action in forma pauperis 18 (IFP) because he has filed three or more federal actions that were dismissed as frivolous, 19 malicious, or on grounds that they failed to state a claim for relief. Accordingly, plaintiff’s 20 application to proceed IFP is DENIED and this federal civil rights suit is DISMISSED 21 without prejudice to plaintiff bringing his claims in a new paid complaint. 22 Plaintiff was ordered to show cause on or before September 23, 2019 why the 23 action should not be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), which provides that a prisoner 24 may not bring a civil action IFP “if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while 25 incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.