Berryhill

Johnson v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20194:18-cv-00921California4,868 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 HOWARD L. JOHNSON, Case No. 4:18-cv-00921-KAW

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

v. JUDGMENT; ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR NANCY A. BERRYHILL, SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 20,

12 Plaintiff Howard L. Johnson seeks judicial review, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), of the Commissioner’s final decision, and the remand of this case for further proceedings. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and Defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment. Having considered the papers filed by the parties, and for the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, and GRANTS Defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment. I. BACKGROUND On September 9, 2014, Plaintiff filed a Title XVI application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) Benefits. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.