Optronic Technologies, Inc. v. Ningbo Sunny Electronic Co., Ltd.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20195:16-cv-06370California6,745 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

OPTRONIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC,

Case No. 5:16-cv-06370-EJD Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART

NINGBO SUNNY ELECTRONIC CO., CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY

LTD., et al., JUDGMENT Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 256, 270

This case is about telescopes and antitrust law. Plaintiff Optronic Technologies, Inc. (“Orion”) has brought claims under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, Section 7 of the Clayton Act, California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), and California’s Cartwright Act against Defendants Ningbo Sunny Electronic Co., Ltd. (“Sunny”), Sunny Optics, Inc. and Meade Instruments, Inc. (“Meade”) (collectively “Defendants”). The court has federal question jurisdiction over Orion’s federal law claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1337, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.