Optronic Technologies, Inc. v. Ningbo Sunny Electronic Co., Ltd.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7
OPTRONIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC,
8 Case No. 5:16-cv-06370-EJD Plaintiff, 9 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT; GRANTING 10 IN PART AND DENYING IN PART
NINGBO SUNNY ELECTRONIC CO., CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY
11 LTD., et al., JUDGMENT 12 Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 256, 270
13 This case is about telescopes and antitrust law. Plaintiff Optronic Technologies, Inc. 14 (“Orion”) has brought claims under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, Section 7 of the Clayton 15 Act, California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), and California’s Cartwright Act against 16 Defendants Ningbo Sunny Electronic Co., Ltd. (“Sunny”), Sunny Optics, Inc. and Meade 17 Instruments, Inc. (“Meade”) (collectively “Defendants”). The court has federal question 18 jurisdiction over Orion’s federal law claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1337, and…