Optronic Technologies, Inc. v. Ningbo Sunny Electronic Co., Ltd.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20195:16-cv-06370California6,745 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7

OPTRONIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC,

8 Case No. 5:16-cv-06370-EJD Plaintiff, 9 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT; GRANTING 10 IN PART AND DENYING IN PART

NINGBO SUNNY ELECTRONIC CO., CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY

11 LTD., et al., JUDGMENT 12 Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 256, 270

13 This case is about telescopes and antitrust law. Plaintiff Optronic Technologies, Inc. 14 (“Orion”) has brought claims under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, Section 7 of the Clayton 15 Act, California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), and California’s Cartwright Act against 16 Defendants Ningbo Sunny Electronic Co., Ltd. (“Sunny”), Sunny Optics, Inc. and Meade 17 Instruments, Inc. (“Meade”) (collectively “Defendants”). The court has federal question 18 jurisdiction over Orion’s federal law claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1337, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.