Izett

Izett v. Crown Asset Management, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 1, 20193:18-cv-05224California7,360 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DAVID ALLAN IZETT, Case No. 18-cv-05224-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO COMPEL

ARBITRATION

CROWN ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC; REBEKAH MOORE A/K/A REBEKAH Docket No. 44 DENYS TONER; THE RESOLUTION

LAW GROUP, APC; PERSOLVE, LLC;

and LUIS DUENAS, Defendants.

14 Plaintiff David Allan Izett (“Plaintiff”) filed suit against Defendants Crown Asset Management (“Crown”); Rebekah Moore; the Resolution Group, APC; Persolve, LLC; and Luis Duenas (collectively “Defendants”). Docket No. 31. The complaint alleges that Defendants made misrepresentations in attempting to collect a debt owed by Plaintiff, thereby violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692–1692p, and the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collections Practices Act (“RFDCPA”), California Civil Code §§ 1788–1788.33. Currently before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration, Docket No. 44 (“Mot.”). For the …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.