Izett
Izett v. Crown Asset Management, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DAVID ALLAN IZETT, Case No. 18-cv-05224-EMC
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
v. MOTION TO COMPEL
ARBITRATION
CROWN ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC; REBEKAH MOORE A/K/A REBEKAH Docket No. 44 DENYS TONER; THE RESOLUTION
LAW GROUP, APC; PERSOLVE, LLC;
and LUIS DUENAS, Defendants.
14 Plaintiff David Allan Izett (“Plaintiff”) filed suit against Defendants Crown Asset Management (“Crown”); Rebekah Moore; the Resolution Group, APC; Persolve, LLC; and Luis Duenas (collectively “Defendants”). Docket No. 31. The complaint alleges that Defendants made misrepresentations in attempting to collect a debt owed by Plaintiff, thereby violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692–1692p, and the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collections Practices Act (“RFDCPA”), California Civil Code §§ 1788–1788.33. Currently before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration, Docket No. 44 (“Mot.”). For the …