Lacy
Lacy v. Berryhill
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 GAYLE AMANDA LACY, Case No. 19-cv-00140-SI
7 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
8 v.
9 ANDREW SAUL1, Re: Dkt. Nos. 15, 16 10 Defendant.
11 12 The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment in this Social Security appeal. 13 Dkt. Nos. 15, 16. Based upon the Court’s review of the parties’ papers and the Administrative 14 Record (“AR”), the Court hereby GRANTS plaintiff’s motion and DENIES defendant’s motion. 15 This matter is REMANDED for immediate payment of benefits. 16 17 BACKGROUND 18 On January 9, 2018, the date of the administrative hearing in this case, plaintiff Gayle 19 Amanda Lacy was a fifty-year-old female with some high school education. AR at 106, 1088. Her 20 work history includes packing warehouse shipments and cleaning airplanes. Id. at 134-35. She 21 ceased working in 2006, and in January 2007 she applied for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) 22 under Title II of the…