Lacy

Lacy v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 1, 20193:19-cv-00140California9,998 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 GAYLE AMANDA LACY, Case No. 19-cv-00140-SI

Plaintiff, ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

v.

ANDREW SAUL1, Re: Dkt. Nos. 15, 16 Defendant.

11 The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment in this Social Security appeal. Dkt. Nos. 15, 16. Based upon the Court’s review of the parties’ papers and the Administrative Record (“AR”), the Court hereby GRANTS plaintiff’s motion and DENIES defendant’s motion. This matter is REMANDED for immediate payment of benefits. 16 BACKGROUND On January 9, 2018, the date of the administrative hearing in this case, plaintiff Gayle Amanda Lacy was a fifty-year-old female with some high school education. AR at 106, 1088. Her work history includes packing warehouse shipments and cleaning airplanes. Id. at 134-35. She ceased working in 2006, and in January 2007 she applied for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.