Nilsen

Nilsen v. Howe

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 1, 20194:19-cv-02917California1,025 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MICHAEL DAVID NILSEN, Case No. 19-cv-02917-PJH

8 Petitioner,

ORDER DISMISSING AMENDED

9 v. PETITION WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

10 LAKE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT,

APPELLATE DEPT.,

11 Respondent.

12 13 Petitioner, a former California prisoner, filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas 14 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The original petition was dismissed with leave to 15 amend and petitioner has filed an amended petition. 16 BACKGROUND 17 Petitioner was convicted of several motor vehicle related charges, all 18 misdemeanors. Docket No. 8 at 1. He was sentenced to 20 days in county jail. Docket 19 No. 1 at 1. 20 DISCUSSION 21 STANDARD OF REVIEW 22 This court may entertain a petition for writ of habeas corpus “in behalf of a person 23 in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court only on the ground that he is in 24 custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States.” …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.