Hamm
Hamm v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20195:16-cv-03370California6,171 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 TERRY HAMM, et al., Case No. 5:16-cv-03370-EJD Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC, JUDGMENT; DENYING PLAINTIFFS’
CROSS-MOTION FOR PARTIAL Defendant. SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION OF
ISSUES
13 Re: Dkt. No. 58 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Terry Hamm (“Hamm”) and Bryce Meeker (“Meeker”) bring various consumer protection claims predicated on allegations that Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (“MBUSA”) knew of and actively concealed defects in vehicle transmission systems. MBUSA moves for summary judgment. Plaintiffs oppose the motion and cross-move for partial summary judgment, or alternatively summary adjudication of issues. Based upon all pleadings filed to date…