Dickey
Dickey v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 TONY DICKEY, et al., Case No. 15-cv-04922-HSG
8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY
APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION
9 v. SETTLEMENT
10 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 153 11 Defendant.
12 13 Pending before the Court is the unopposed motion for preliminary approval of class action 14 settlement filed by Plaintiffs Tony Dickey and Paul Parmer. Dkt. No. 153. The parties have 15 reached a settlement regarding Plaintiffs’ claims and now seek the required court approval. For 16 the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary approval of 17 class action settlement. 18 I. BACKGROUND 19 A. Factual Background 20 Plaintiffs bring this consumer class action against Defendant Advanced Micro Devices, 21 Inc. (“AMD”), alleging that Defendant engaged in deceptive practices when it purportedly 22 misrepresented the number of central processing units (“CPUs”) in its “Bulldozer Processors.” 23 See generally…