Ward

Ward v. The County of Mendocino

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20194:17-cv-00911California3,888 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARGARET WARD, et al., Case No. 17-cv-00911-PJH Plaintiffs,

v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’

THE COUNTY OF MENDOCINO, et al., MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE

FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT

Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 161

13 Plaintiffs Ina Ward, Kevin Ward, and Margaret Ward’s motion for leave to file a fourth amended complaint came on for hearing before this court on September 11, 2019. Plaintiffs appeared through their counsel, T. Kennedy Helm, IV and David Fiol. Defendants the County of Mendocino (the “County”), Lorrie Knapp, Michael Grant, and Sheriff Thomas D. Allman (together the “County Defendants”) appeared through their counsel, Denise Billups-Slone and Brina Blanton. Defendants California Forensic Medical Group, Inc. (“CFMG”) and Dr. Michael Medvin appeared through their counsel, Jerome Varanini. Having read the papers filed by the parties and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.