United States of America v. Sutter Health

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20195:18-cv-02067California1,611 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11

12 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Case No. 18-CV-02067-LHK

13 Plaintiffs,

ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO

WITHDRAW; PRO SE PROGRAM;

14 v.

SERVICE OF COMPLAINT; CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; AND

15 SUTTER HEALTH, et al., DISCOVERY STAY 16 Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 24 17 18 This case is a qui tam action alleging violations of the federal and California False Claims 19 Acts. Plaintiff-Relator Judy Jones (“Jones”) commenced this action pro se on April 4, 2018. ECF 20 No. 1. Counsel Barry Himmelstein (“Himmelstein”) filed a notice of appearance on May 24, 21 2018. ECF No. 9. An Amended Complaint was filed on October 19, 2018. ECF No. 13. Before 22 the Court is the motion for order permitting withdrawal (“motion”) of Himmelstein, counsel for 23 Plaintiff-Relator Jones. ECF No. 24. The Court held a hearing on the motion on Thursday, 24 October 3, 2019. 25 I. LEGAL STANDARD 26 “An attorney may not withdraw as counsel except by leave of court.” Darby v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.