Kannan
Kannan v. Apple Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 RAJA KANNAN, Case No.17-cv-07305-EJD (VKD)
9 Plaintiff,
ORDER RE FURTHER DEPOSITION
10 v. OF PLAINTIFF
11 APPLE INC., Dkt. No. 112 Defendant. 12
13 The Court has considered the parties’ submissions and arguments on the question of 14 whether and under what circumstances defendant Apple Inc. make take a further deposition of 15 plaintiff Raja Kannan. Dkt. Nos. 112, 130, 131, 137. As the Court explained in its September 25, 16 2019 order, Apple has made a showing that some documents it sought in discovery in advance of 17 Mr. Kannan’s May 1, 2019 deposition were not timely produced, and that Mr. Kannan may have 18 withheld improperly an unknown quantity of responsive documents on grounds of privilege. See 19 Dkt. No. 120 at 5–6. The parties have made a number of submissions since then advising the 20 Court of their respective views regarding whether Mr. Kannan may be deposed by 21 videoconference…