Wilson
Wilson v. Members of San Quentin State Prison East Block Condemned Row 2 Building & Mail Room Members
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3
ANDREAU GERALD WILSON,
4 Case No. 19-cv-00919-RS (PR) Plaintiff, 5 v. ORDER OF DISMISSAL 6
MEMBERS OF SAN QUENTIN
7 STATE PRISON EAST BLOCK
CONDEMNED ROW 2 BUILDING &
8 MAIL ROOM MEMBERS,
9 Defendants.
10 11 INTRODUCTION 12 Plaintiff fails to state any claim for relief in either of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 13 complaints. Accordingly, this federal civil rights suit is DISMISSED. 14 DISCUSSION 15 A. Standard of Review 16 A “complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a 17 claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) 18 (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). “A claim has facial 19 plausibility when the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the 20 reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.” Id. (quoting 21 Twombly, 550 U.S. at 556). …