Wilson
Wilson v. Members of San Quentin State Prison East Block Condemned Row 2 Building & Mail Room Members
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ANDREAU GERALD WILSON,
Case No. 19-cv-00919-RS (PR) Plaintiff, 5 v. ORDER OF DISMISSAL
MEMBERS OF SAN QUENTIN
STATE PRISON EAST BLOCK
CONDEMNED ROW 2 BUILDING &
MAIL ROOM MEMBERS,
Defendants.
10 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff fails to state any claim for relief in either of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaints. Accordingly, this federal civil rights suit is DISMISSED. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A “complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). “A claim has facial plausibility when the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.” Id. (quoting Twombly, 550 U.S. at 556). …