Ascarie

Ascarie v. The County of Santa Clara

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20195:16-cv-05031California838 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 MAHMOUD ASCARIE, Case No.16-cv-05031-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SET

v. ASIDE DISMISSAL

THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 93 Defendants.

13 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b), pro se plaintiff Mahmoud Ascarie moves to set aside the stipulated dismissal of this action. Dkt. Nos. 91, 93. Defendants County of Santa Clara (“the County”), Jim Lanz, MaryEllen Luna, Daren Wardell, Michael Harrison, and Joseph Takacs oppose the motion. Dkt. No. 94. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds Mr. Ascarie’s motion suitable for decision without oral argument. Based on the parties’ written submissions, the Court denies Mr. Ascarie’s motion to reopen this action. I. BACKGROUND Mr. Ascarie filed this action on August 31, 2016 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983, asserting that defendants violated his constitutional rights to free speech, equal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.