Farfan
Farfan v. SSC Carmichael Operating Company LP
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 NAOMI FARFAN, et al., Case No. 18-cv-01472-HSG
8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE
9 v. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION,
GRANTING MOTION FOR
10 SSC CARMICHAEL OPERATING RECONSIDERATION, AND COMPANY LP, et al., DISMISSING PUTATIVE CLASS 11 CLAIMS Defendants. 12 Re: Dkt. Nos. 54, 60
13 14 Defendants seek reconsideration of the Court’s February 1 and February 19, 2019 orders 15 compelling Plaintiffs’ putative class claims to arbitration. Dkt. Nos. 54, 60. For the reasons 16 discussed below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion for leave to file motion for 17 reconsideration. Having granted Defendants’ motion for leave, the Court construes the motion for 18 reconsideration as fully briefed in the parties’ motion for leave papers, and GRANTS Defendants’ 19 motion for reconsideration. 20 I. BACKGROUND 21 Plaintiffs bring this putative class and…