Adkins

Adkins v. Adkins

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20194:19-cv-05535California5,249 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ARTEMIZ ADKINS, Case No. 19-cv-05535-HSG

8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR

RETURN OF CHILD UNDER SIXTEEN

9 v. YEARS OLD

10 GARRETT ADKINS, Re: Dkt. No. 1 11 Defendant.

12 13 Pending before the Court is the petition filed by Petitioner Artemiz Adkins for the return of 14 her daughter A.F.A. to Switzerland pursuant to the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of 15 International Child Abduction, Oct. 25, 1980, 19 I.L.M. 1501, as implemented by the International 16 Child Abduction Remedies Act (“ICARA”), codified at 42 U.S.C. §§ 11601, et seq. (“the 17 Convention”). Dkt. No. 1. 18 The Court has considered the parties’ testimony and evidence submitted at the evidentiary 19 hearing; each of the declarations submitted by Petitioner and Respondent Garett Adkins, including 20 their submissions in support of and in opposition to Petitioner’s motion for a Temporary 21 Restraining Order; the Verified Petition; and the Response…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.