Ruiz

Ruiz v. Hatton

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 8, 20193:17-cv-06706California183 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MATTHEW RUIZ, Case No. 17-cv-06706-EMC 8 Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S

9 Vv. REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATE OF

APPEALABILITY

10 SHAWN HATTON, Docket No. 27 11 Defendant. a 12

13 Petitioner filed a notice of appeal and requested a certificate of appealability. See 28

14 || U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). The application for a certificate of appealability is 15 || DENIED because Petitioner has not demonstrated that “jurists of reason would find it debatable 16 || whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right... .” Slack v.

= 17 || McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).

18 The Clerk shall forward to the Court of Appeals the case file with this order. See United 19 States v. Asrar, 116 F.3d 1268, 1270 (9th Cir. 1997). 20 This order disposes of Docket No. 27. 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 || Dated: October 8, 2019 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.