McAleenan

Doe 1 v. McAleenan

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 8, 20195:18-cv-02349California4,209 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 JANE DOE 1, et al., Case No.18-cv-02349-BLF (VKD)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 218 Defendants.

In connection with their efforts to obtain jurisdictional discovery, plaintiffs move to compel the production of an unredacted version of document DEF-00001931 (“DEF-1931”), which defendants produced and later clawed back on grounds that the document contained material protected by the law enforcement privilege. Dkt. No. 218. Plaintiffs also seek an award of monetary and other sanctions against defendants. Id. As the Court has already resolved plaintiffs’ motion to compel, see Dkt. No. 243, this order addresses only plaintiffs’ request for sanctions. The Court heard oral argument on plaintiffs’ motion to compel and for sanctions on October 1, 2019. Dkt. No. 241. Having considered the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.