McAleenan

Doe 1 v. McAleenan

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 8, 20195:18-cv-02349California652 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 JANE DOE 1, et al., Case No.18-cv-02349-BLF (VKD)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING

v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE

UNDER SEAL

KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 217 Defendants.

13 In connection with plaintiffs’ motion to compel and for sanctions (Dkt. No. 218), plaintiffs filed an administrative motion to file portions of the accompanying attorney declaration and an exhibit under seal. Dkt. No. 217. Although the portions sought to be sealed were designated confidential by defendants, defendants did not file a response pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79- 5(e)(1). Nevertheless, having considered plaintiffs’ submission, the Court grants the administrative motion, as set forth below. There is a strong presumption in favor of access by the public to judicial records and documents accompanying dispositive motions that can be overcome only by a showing of “compelling reasons supported by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.