Carl Washington v. CVS Pharmacy Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20194:15-cv-03504California646 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 CHRISTOPHER CORCORAN, ET AL., CASE NO. 15-cv-03504-YGR

6 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION RE: MOTION TO

7 vs. SUBSTITUTE CLASS REPRESENTATIVES AND

FOR CERTIFICATION OF NEW YORK AND

8 CVS HEALTH, ET AL., ARIZONA CLASSES 9 Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 386

10 11 On August 19, 2019, the Court held a further case management conference in the above- 12 captioned action. (See Dkt. No. 370.) During the conference, the Court indicated that it would 13 allow plaintiffs “a very short, very short period of time . . . to identify an appropriate plaintiff or 14 plaintiffs and any appropriate discovery and motion practice” relevant to the proposed New York 15 and Arizona classes. (Dkt. No. 373 at 5:24-25–6:1-12.) The Court set a deadline for plaintiffs’ 16 motion to substitute the class representatives for the proposed New York and Arizona classes of 17 September 9, 2019. (Id. at 13:7-9.) Plaintiffs so filed. (See Dkt. No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.