Panah
Panah v. State of California Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 HOOMAN PANAKH, an individual, Case No. 14-00166 BLF (PR) Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
V. COMPEL PLAINTIFF’S
4 RESPONSES TO DEFENDANTS’
TATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPT. OF WRITTEN DISCOVERY; DENYING
41 TORRE CTIONS wD 0 RENEWED MOTION TO APPOINT 14 COUNSEL; GRANTING REHABILITATION, et al., EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
RESPONSE TO COURT ORDER
15 Defendants. 16 (Docket Nos. 135, 144, 147)
(17
Z 18 Plaintiff, an inmate on death row at San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”) proceeding 19 || pro se, filed a second amended complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging 20 || unconstitutional acts by SQSP correctional officers. The Court found several of Plaintiffs 21 || claims cognizable, and scheduled briefing on the matter. (Docket No. 69.) Defendants 22 || filed a motion to compel Plaintiff's…