Panah

Panah v. State of California Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20195:14-cv-00166California843 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 HOOMAN PANAKH, an individual, Case No. 14-00166 BLF (PR) Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

V. COMPEL PLAINTIFF’S

RESPONSES TO DEFENDANTS’

TATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPT. OF WRITTEN DISCOVERY; DENYING

TORRE CTIONS wD RENEWED MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL; GRANTING REHABILITATION, et al., EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

RESPONSE TO COURT ORDER

Defendants. (Docket Nos. 135, 144, 147)

(

Z Plaintiff, an inmate on death row at San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”) proceeding || pro se, filed a second amended complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging || unconstitutional acts by SQSP correctional officers. The Court found several of Plaintiffs || claims cognizable, and scheduled briefing on the matter. (Docket No. 69.) Defendants || filed a motion to compel Plaintiff's…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.