Glass

Glass v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20193:16-cv-02142California250 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LEIGH GLASS, Case No. 16-cv-02142-JD Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, et al., Defendants.

This case has been inactive since May 9, 2018, when pro se plaintiff Leigh Glass filed a || case management statement asking that “scheduling be postponed” and “setting a trial date be |} postponed,” to allow further attempts at settlement. Dkt. No. 61 at 4. Consequently, on || September 13, 2019, the Court issued an order for plaintiff Glass to show cause why the case should not be dismissed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), for failure to prosecute. |} Dkt. No. 63. The deadline for a response was September 25, 2019. No response has been filed. Plaintiff has failed to show any cause why the case should not be dismissed and she || appears to have abandoned the case. While the Court favors the disposition of cases on the merits, || it has considered the five factors set…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.