Shaw

Shaw v. Gera

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20195:18-cv-06765California3,328 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7

CECIL EUGENE SHAW,

8 Case No. 5:18-cv-06765-EJD Plaintiff, 9 ORDER GRANTING IN PART v. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR 10 ATTORNEYS’ FEES NICHOLAS GERA, et al., 11 Re: Dkt. No. 34 Defendants. 12

13 In 2016, Plaintiff pursued an action against Defendants for violations of the Americans 14 with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”). The parties settled the claims in a 2016 settlement 15 agreement. Two years later, Plaintiff brought an action pursuing the same claims covered by, and 16 released in, this agreement. Defendant Flights Restaurant1 (“Defendant”) argues that because the 17 settlement agreement precluded this litigation, Defendant is entitled to an award of attorneys’ fees. 18 Defendant Flights Memorandum of Points and Authorities (“Mot. Atty Fees”), Dkt. 35. The Court 19 finds it appropriate to take the motion under submission for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.