Cadena
Cadena v. Preston
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
VICTOR CADENA,
Case No. 19-cv-02856-RS (PR) Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER REOPENING ACTION;
J. PRESTON, ORDER OF DISMISSAL
14 Defendant.
16 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff fails to state any claim for relief in his amended 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Accordingly, this federal civil rights action is DISMISSED. This suit was dismissed because plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint by the deadline. He since has filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, the judgment and the order of dismissal are VACATED. (Dkt. Nos. 5 and 6.) The Clerk shall reopen this action and modify the docket to reflect this fact. The Court now will review the amended complaint. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A “complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). “A claim has…