Cadena

Cadena v. Preston

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 10, 20193:19-cv-02856California1,091 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

VICTOR CADENA,

11 Case No. 19-cv-02856-RS (PR) Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER REOPENING ACTION; 13

J. PRESTON, ORDER OF DISMISSAL

14 Defendant. 15

16 17 INTRODUCTION 18 Plaintiff fails to state any claim for relief in his amended 42 U.S.C. § 1983 19 complaint. Accordingly, this federal civil rights action is DISMISSED. 20 This suit was dismissed because plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint by the 21 deadline. He since has filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, the judgment and the 22 order of dismissal are VACATED. (Dkt. Nos. 5 and 6.) The Clerk shall reopen this action 23 and modify the docket to reflect this fact. The Court now will review the amended 24 complaint. 25 DISCUSSION 26 A. Standard of Review 27 A “complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a 1 (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). “A claim has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.