Charlotte B Milliner v. Mutual Securities, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 9, 20194:15-cv-03354-DMRCalifornia4,019 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CHARLOTTE B. MILLINER, et al., Case No. 15-cv-03354-DMR

8 Plaintiffs,

ORDER ON MOTION FOR

9 v. RECONSIDERATION AND OTHER

PENDING MOTIONS

10 MUTUAL SECURITIES, INC.,

11 Defendant.

12 The court currently has four motions before it. Plaintiffs Charlotte B. Milliner and Joann 13 Brem move pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) for relief from a portion of the 14 court’s July 8, 2019 order on Defendant Mutual Securities, Inc.’s (“MSI”) motion to enforce the 15 parties’ settlement agreement and stipulated protective order. [Docket No. 201.] Plaintiffs also 16 move to vacate the court’s September 11, 2018 dismissal order. [Docket No. 193.] Proposed 17 Intervenor Vincent Gilotti moves to intervene. [Docket No. 198.] Finally, as part of MSI’s 18 motion to enforce the settlement agreement, the parties have submitted supplemental briefing on 19 Monster Energy v. Schechter, 7 Cal. 5th 781 (2019). [Docket Nos. 212, 214, 216, 217.] All four matters are suitable for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.