Taylor

Taylor v. Jaime

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 10, 20193:19-cv-05664California1,060 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EUREKA DIVISION 7 8 NAMON TAYLOR, Case No. 19-cv-05664-RMI

9 Plaintiff,

ORDER FOR RESPONDENT TO

10 v. SHOW CAUSE

11 GEORGE JAIME, Re: Dkt. No. 1 12 Defendant.

13 14 Petitioner, a California prisoner, filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant 15 to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner was convicted in Alameda County, so venue is proper here. See 28 16 U.S.C. § 2241(d). Petitioner has paid the filing fee and consented to the jurisdiction of a 17 Magistrate Judge. See (dkts. 7, 9). 18 BACKGROUND 19 Petitioner was convicted of committing two robberies and possessing a firearm as a felon. 20 People v. Taylor, No. A148960, 2018 WL 3968496, at *1 (Cal. Ct. App. Aug. 20, 2018). 21 Petitioner was sentenced to a 15-year term in state prison. Id. at 3. On direct appeal, the state 22 appellate court remanded for the trial court to consider whether to impose the firearm-use 23 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.