Martin

Martin v. Muniz

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20195:17-cv-01690California2,554 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 || GEORGE MARTIN, Case No. 17-01690 BLF (PR) Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING

9 MOTION TO SCREEN 10 V. SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT; PARTIAL

DISMISSAL AND

SERVICE; ADDRESSING

W. MUNIZ, et al., PENDING MOTIONS

Defendants.

(Docket Nos. 128, 130, 134) 16

M Plaintiff, a California inmate, filed the instant pro se civil ~ 18 || rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against prison |! officials at Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”). The Court °° || granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for failing *! || to comply with Rules 18 and 20 of the Federal Rules of Civil *? || Procedure (“FRCP”), and granted Plaintiff leave to amend to *3 || attempt to correct the deficiencies. (Docket No. 98.) Plaintiff ** || filed an amended complaint, (Docket No. 107), which the Court || screened and again dismissed for failure to comply with Rule || 18(a). (Docket No. 120.) Plaintiff filed a second amended |…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.