Starr Indemnity and Liability Insurance Company v. Camenzind Dredging, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 11, 20195:19-cv-00694California2,597 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11

12 STARR INDEMNITY AND LIABILITY Case No. 19-CV-00694-LHK

INSURANCE COMPANY,

13 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

DISMISS OR STAY

14 v. Re: Dkt. No. 16, 17 15

CAMENZIND DREDGING, INC.,

16 Defendant. 17 18 Defendant Camenzind Dredging, Inc. (“Camenzind”) brings a motion to dismiss Plaintiff 19 Starr Indemnity and Liability Insurance Company’s (“Starr”) complaint or, alternatively, to stay 20 the case. ECF No. 16. Having considered the submissions of the parties, the relevant law, and the 21 record in this case, the Court DENIES the motion to dismiss or stay the case. 22 I. BACKGROUND 23 A. Factual Background 24 On or about July 7, 2017, Paul Williams filed a complaint against Camenzind and MB 25 Marine, Inc. (“MB Marine,” formerly known as Maritime Logistics, Inc.) in the Superior Court of 26 California, County of San Luis Obispo. ECF No. 1 (“Compl.”), ¶ 5. Williams’s state court 27 complaint alleges that he sustained a knee injury while working aboard a vessel…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.