Rodriguez
Rodriguez v. Koenig
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3
CESAR A. RODRIGUEZ,
4 Case No. 19-cv-01273-YGR (PR) Plaintiff, 5 ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL; v. AND SERVICE OF COGNIZABLE 6 CLAIMS CRAIG KOENIG, et al., 7 Defendants. 8
9 I. INTRODUCTION 10 Plaintiff, a former state prisoner who was previously incarcerated at the Correctional 11 Training Facility (“CTF”), filed a pro se civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 12 Plaintiff will be granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in a separate written Order. 13 Venue is proper because the events giving rise to the claim are alleged to have occurred in 14 CTF, which is located in this judicial district. See 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). 15 In his complaint, Plaintiff names the following Defendants: CTF Warden Craig Koenig; 16 California Board of Parole Hearings (“BPH” or “Board”) Commissioner Pete Labahn; BPH 17 Deputy Commissioner James Martin, and “‘Doe’s’ Board members and California courts.” Dkt. 1…