Pearce

Avaya Inc. v. Pearce

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20193:19-cv-00565California369 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 AVAYA INC., Case No. 19-cv-00565-SI

Plaintiff, ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S v. ADMINSTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL

RAYMOND BRADLEY PEARCE, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 128 Defendants.

12 On October 4, 2019, plaintiff filed an administrative motion to file under seal a number of exhibits in support of plaintiff’s supplemental opposition to defendants’ motions to dismiss. Dkt. No. 128. All of the exhibits have been designated as “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” by the DBSI defendants. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(e)(1), “[w]ithin 4 days of the filing of the Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, the Designating Party must file a declaration as required by subsection 79-5(d)(1)(A) establishing that all of the designated material is sealable.” The DBSI defendants have not filed the required declaration. The Court directs the DBSI defendants to file a declaration no later than October 17, 2019, demonstrating why…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.