Vaden

Vaden v. Linn Star Transfer, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20194:19-cv-01846California1,649 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 FAYE VADEN, et al., Case No. 19-cv-01846-HSG

8 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

AMEND COMPLAINT AND DENYING

9 v. MOTION TO ALTER SCHEDULING

ORDER

10 LINN STAR TRANSFER, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 37, 39, 40 11 Defendants.

12 13 Pending before the Court are several motions filed by Plaintiffs Faye Vaden and Alma 14 Jackson related to the Court’s scheduling order in this action: (1) a motion for leave to amend the 15 complaint after the deadline, see Dkt. No. 37; (2) a motion to modify the case schedule, see Dkt. 16 No. 40; and (3) a motion to expedite the hearing on both motions, see Dkt. No. 39. The Court held 17 a case management conference on October 8, 2019, at which it heard argument on these motions 18 and discussed the current case schedule. See Dkt. No. 44. The Court also permitted Plaintiffs to 19 file a supplementary declaration in support of these motions. See Dkt. Nos. 46. 48. Having 20 carefully considered the parties’ arguments,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.