Vaden

Vaden v. Linn Star Transfer, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20194:19-cv-01846California1,649 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 FAYE VADEN, et al., Case No. 19-cv-01846-HSG

Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

AMEND COMPLAINT AND DENYING

v. MOTION TO ALTER SCHEDULING

ORDER

LINN STAR TRANSFER, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 37, 39, 40 Defendants.

12 Pending before the Court are several motions filed by Plaintiffs Faye Vaden and Alma Jackson related to the Court’s scheduling order in this action: (1) a motion for leave to amend the complaint after the deadline, see Dkt. No. 37; (2) a motion to modify the case schedule, see Dkt. No. 40; and (3) a motion to expedite the hearing on both motions, see Dkt. No. 39. The Court held a case management conference on October 8, 2019, at which it heard argument on these motions and discussed the current case schedule. See Dkt. No. 44. The Court also permitted Plaintiffs to file a supplementary declaration in support of these motions. See Dkt. Nos. 46. 48. Having carefully considered the parties’ arguments,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.